
32 AJTCCM VOL. 31 NO. 1 2025
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RESEARCH
the TBLC histological specimen was considered insucient to make
a clear diagnosis. An SLB was performed in one of these cases, which
diagnosed adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary and lipidic pattern.
Discussion
In this pilot cohort, we found TBLC performed under conscious
sedation to be well tolerated with few complications. Furthermore, it
had a high diagnostic yield when a 1.7 mm cryoprobe was used, and
enabled us to avoid SLB in the majority of cases. e overall diagnostic
yield from our TBLC cohort was 85%, which is higher than in many
comparable studies in the existing literature.
e largest meta-analysis, by Rodrigues etal.,[4] described a pooled
diagnostic yield of 77%, rising to 81% in more experienced centres that
had performed >70 procedures. e type of sedation is not specically
described, but the majority of centres perform conventional TBLC
under general anaesthesia with a denitive airway, allowing more
rapid and easy access to the airway aer each sample. When looking at
TBLC performed under conscious sedation, diagnostic yields ranged
from 67% to 90%.[8-10] Notably, the study by Salton etal.[8] reported a
diagnostic yield of 90%, but only included 11 patients. Our results,
which are similar to those at high-volume centres, may be attributable
to the level of experience of the primary operator, but do lend support
to more frequent use of this technique going forward, especially in
resource-constrained settings. Training personnel in advanced
bronchoscopic techniques, as well as strengthening the MDT with
members who have specialised in thoracic radiology and pathology,
will further build up this service.
e most common complications in our study were pneumothorax
not requiring intervention (10%) and moderate bleeding (5%), which
are comparable with rates reported in the literature. In Rodrigues
etal.,[4] the reported pooled incidence was 5.6% (95% condence
interval (CI) 3.8 - 8.2) for pneumothorax requiring chest tube
insertion and 10% (95% CI6.8-14.3) for signicant bleeding (7% for
centres with >70 TBLCs). A further 1.4% of patients (95% CI0.9-2.2)
experienced an acute exacerbation of ILD aer TBLC,[4] which was
not seen in our cohort, possibly owing to patient selection as well
our limited sample size. Our patients did not experience any form of
complication related to the use of conscious sedation, and its use did
not limit the number of samples taken. Notably, there were no deaths
in our cohort.
Smaller individual studies similar to ours, with sample sizes ranging
from 12 to 100, had pneumothorax incidences of 13-20%, with small
proportions of patients requiring chest tube insertion.[8-10] These
studies did not routinely use uoroscopy, however, and although
it has been postulated that use of uoroscopy reduces the risk of
pneumothorax, this has not been consistently shown in the literature.
Probe size is also thought to play a role, with the smallest 1.1 mm
cryoprobe being shown to have the lowest risk for pneumothorax.[11]
Bleeding rates vary widely and significantly between studies,
with another meta-analysis reporting ranges from 0% to 70%, with
a mean incidence of 27%.[12] Discrepancies may arise as a result of
dierences in dening the severity of bleeds, the size of probes used,
the number of samples, and the presence of pulmonary hypertension.
Even when considering these factors, the bleeding rate in our cohort
was similar to that described by Johannson etal.[12] Timely diagnosis
in patients with ILD is a key component of an eective management
strategy.[4] When standard diagnostic pathways, including clinical
evaluation, serological or bronchial lavage ndings and correlation
with HRCT imaging of the chest and followed by an MDT meeting
of pulmonologists and chest radiologists, do not yield a diagnosis,
histopathological sampling may be deemed necessary. With the
current safety prole, it appears that in appropriately selected patients
and in experienced centres, TBLC under conscious sedation is
feasible and safe as a rst-line histopathological sampling procedure,
particularly in resource-constrained areas where general anaesthesia
is not readily available.
A key strength of our pilot study was conrmation that the practice
of performing TBLC under conscious sedation can be continued,
particularly in resource-constrained settings. Limitations include
the relatively small sample size, and the fact that one (experienced)
endoscopist performed all 20 procedures, which limits extrapolation
beyond a large-volume centre and procedures performed by
experienced bronchoscopists.
Conclusion
TBLC performed at an experienced bronchoscopy centre using
a 1.7mm cryoprobe under conscious sedation with a dedicated
sedationist is safe and well tolerated, and has a high diagnostic
yield. Using the proposed technique, accessibility to TBLC may be
significantly and feasibly increased in our resource-constrained
environment.
Data availability. e datasets generated and analysed during the present
study are available from the corresponding author (CFNK) on reasonable
request.
Declaration. e research for this study was done in partial fullment of
the requirements for ADB’s MPhil (Pulmonology) degree at Stellenbosch
University.
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Mr Daniel Mashishi from
the Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Stellenbosch University
for his contribution to the statistical analysis.
Author contributions. ADB and CFNK contributed to the design and
data analysis. ADB collected the study data. ADB, NS and CK wrote the
rst dra of the manuscript, which was reviewed and edited by all co-
authors.
Funding.None.
Conicts of interest.None.
1. Lentz RJ, Christine Argento A, Colby TV, Rickman OB, Maldonado F. Transbronchial
cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease: A state-of-the-art review of
procedural techniques, current evidence, and future challenges. J Thorac Dis
2017;9(7):2186-2203. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.06.96
2. Korevaar DA, Colella S, Fally M, etal. European Respiratory Society guidelines on
transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir
J 2022;60(5):2200425. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00425-2022
3. Babiak A, Hetzel J, Krishna G, etal. Transbronchial cryobiopsy: A new tool for lung
biopsies. Respiration 2009;78(2):203-208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000203987
4. Rodrigues I, Gomes RE, Coutinho LM, et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of
transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and surgical lung biopsy in interstitial lung diseases:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2022;31(166):210280. https://
doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0280-2021
5. Herth F, Mayer M, iboutot J, etal. Safety and performance of transbronchial
cryobiopsy for parenchymal lung lesions. Chest 2021;160(4):1512-1519. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.063