Diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in preterm neonates with respiratory distress at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in South Africa
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Accumulating data suggest the potential for lung ultrasound (LUS) to diagnose pathology in preterm babies, but there are no published data from South Africa (SA).
Objectives. To describe LUS diagnoses, respiratory pathology and outcomes in preterm babies receiving non-invasive respiratory support in a tertiary SA neonatal unit, and to compare LUS with clinical diagnoses and surfactant administration.
Methods. We conducted a prospective, observational study of babies at 27 - 34 weeks’ gestation, with birthweight ≥800 g, receiving non-invasive respiratory support and who had LUS at age ≤3 hours. Surfactant was administered at a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.35 - 0.45 and was not influenced by LUS findings.
Results. Fifty-one neonates were included, of whom 16% received surfactant, all with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as their only clinical diagnosis, compared with multiple diagnoses in the non-surfactant group, including RDS (93%), transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) (16%) and pneumonia (14%). Lung ultrasound indicated less RDS in the non-surfactant group than the surfactant group (42% v. 88%; p=0.02), and more TTN (61% v. 13%; p=0.01). The LUS score (LUSS) predicted surfactant administration (area under the curve 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.67 - 0.94)). A LUSS of 7 had the best combined sensitivity (75%) and specificity (72%) but a low positive-predictive value (33%). A LUSS of 8 identified 8 (19%; n=8/43) additional babies for surfactant who did not need treatment.
Conclusion. LUS suggested more diagnoses than clinical assessment, particularly TTN, but did not accurately predict surfactant administration at an FiO2 of 0.35 - 0.45.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJCH is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome – 2019 Update. Neonatology 2019;115(4):432-450. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499361
2. Hubbard RM, Choudhury KM, Lim G. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in neonates diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome in a low-income country: A report from Bangladesh. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2018:38(4):216-217. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000547316.94472.45
3. Bahadue FL, Soll R. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11(11):CD001456. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001456.pub2
4. Aly H. Respiratory disorders in the newborn: Identification and diagnosis. Pediatr Rev 2004;25(6):201-208. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.25-6-201
5. Capasso L, Pacella D, Migliaro F, De Luca D, Raimondi F. Can lung ultrasound score accurately predict the need for surfactant replacement in preterm neonates? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. PLoS ONE 2021;16(7):e0255332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255332
RESEARCH
data-collection by one clinician performing LUS scans, and bias was limited with LUS interpretation by a blinded clinician. Additionally, while sample size constraints limit generalisability, it does not invalidate the trends observed.
Conclusion
6. Raimondi F, Yousef N, Migliaro F, Capasso L, De Luca D. Point-of-care lung ultrasound in neonatology: Classification into descriptive and functional applications. Pediatric Res 2021;90:524-531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390- 018-0114-9
7. De Martino L, Yousef N, Ben-Ammar R, Raimondi F, Shankar-Aguilera S, De Luca D. Lung ultrasound score predicts surfactant need in extremely preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2018;142(3):e20180463. https://doi.org/10.1542/ peds.2018-0463
8. Brat R, Yousef N, Klifa R, Reynaud S, Aguilera SS, De Luca D. Lung ultrasonography score to evaluate oxygenation and surfactant need in neonates treated with continuous positive airway pressure. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169(8):e151797. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1797
9. Rodriguez-Fanjul J, Jordan I, Balaguer M, Batista-Muñoz A, Ramon M, Bobillo- Perez S. Early surfactant replacement guided by lung ultrasound in preterm newborns with RDS: The ULTRASURF randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179(12):1913-1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03744-y
10. Gomond-Le Goff C, Vivalda L, Foligno S, Loi B, Yousef N, De Luca D. Effect of different probes and expertise on the interpretation reliability of point-of- care lung ultrasound. Chest 2020;157(4):924-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chest.2019.11.013
11. Corsini I, Parri N, Gozzini E, et al. Lung ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of respiratory distress in neonates. Neonatology 2019;115(1):77-84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493001.
12. Ballard J, Khoury J, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr 1991;119(3):417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6
13. Van Wyk L, Smith J. Postnatal Foot Length to Determine Gestational Age: A pilot study. J Trop Pediatr 2016;62(2):144-151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ tropej/fmv093
14. Paul SP, Khattak H, Kini PK, Heaton PA, Goel N. NICE guideline review: neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195). Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2022;107(4):292-297. https://doi.org/10.1136/ archdischild-2021-322349
15. Migliaro F, Salome S, Corsini I, et al.; NeoLUS Collaborative Study Group. Neonatal lung ultrasound: From paradox to diagnosis... and beyond. Early Hum Dev 2020;150:105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105184
16. Copetti R, Cattarossi L. The ‘double lung point’: An ultrasound sign diagnostic of transient tachypnea of the newborn. Neonatology 2007;91(3):203-209. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097454
17. LiuJ,WangY,FuW,YangCS,HuangJJ.Diagnosisofneonataltransienttachypnea and its differentiation from respiratory distress syndrome using lung ultrasound. Medicine 2014;93(27):e197. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000000197
18. Rath C, Suryawanshi P. Point-of-care neonatal ultrasound in neonatology. J Neonatol2018;32(1):27-37. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0973217918766994
19. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The ‘lung point’: An ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 2000;26(10):1434-1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340000627
20. Singh P, Patnaik S, Verma A, Garegrat R, Maheshwari R, Suryawanshi P. Diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in predicting the need for surfactant therapy in preterm neonates with respiratory distress. Front Pediatr 2023;11:1307761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1307761
21. Wang J, Wei H, Chen H, et al. Application of ultrasonography in neonatal lung disease: An updated review. Front Pediatr 2022;10:1020437. https://doi. org/10.3389/fped.2022.1020437
22. Wang Y, Li N, Qu Y. Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for transient tachypnea: A meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2022;98(4):329-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jped.2021.10.003
23. Liu J, Liu F, Liu Y, Wang HW, Feng ZC. Lung Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of severe neonatal pneumonia. Chest 2014;146(2):383-388. https://doi.org/10.1378/ chest.13-2852
24. Obuchowski NA, Bullen JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: Review of methods with applications in diagnostic medicine. Phys Med Biol 2018;63(7):07TR01. http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aab4b1