Algorithmic governance in artificial intelligence-driven health systems: A southern African perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of algorithmic systems in public health is expanding rapidly in southern Africa, particularly in areas such as disease prediction, resource allocation and personalised healthcare. While these technologies offer efficiencies, their outputs are shaped by the quality, representativeness and governance of the underlying data. Tools such as polygenic risk scores and pathogen genomics often underperform in black African populations owing to under‐representation in genomic datasets, limiting clinical accuracy and access to precision health benefits. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, these disparities are amplified by fragmented health data systems, limited digital infrastructure, and weak regulatory oversight. Such conditions undermine the ability to detect and correct algorithmic bias, increasing the risk that digital health tools perpetuate inequities affecting rural, low‐income and marginalised populations. In this context, algorithmic systems may unintentionally reinforce existing health disparities. This commentary draws on the concept of biopolitics to highlight how algorithmic tools classify and manage populations through data‐driven processes. It emphasises the need for greater transparency, inclusion and accountability in the development and deployment of these technologies. Aligning health technology assessment processes with equity‐driven metrics and locally governed standards is essential to ensure that algorithmic governance supports, rather than undermines, equitable public health outcomes in the region.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJPH is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
How to Cite
References
1. Hunter DJ, Holmes C. Where medical statistics meets artificial intelligence. N Engl J Med 2023;389(13):1211‐1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2212850
2. Delgado J, de Manuel A, Parra I, et al. Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID‐19: A scoping review. J Bioeth Inq 2022;19(3):407‐419. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11673‐022‐10200‐z
3. Wesson P, Hswen Y, Valdes G, Stojanovski K, Handley MA. Risks and opportunities to ensure equity in the application of big data research in public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2022;43(1):59‐78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐publhealth‐051920‐110928
4. Rabinow P, Rose N. Biopower today. BioSocieties 2006;1(2):195‐217. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1745855206040014
5. Foucault M. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978‐1979. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
6. Chin MH, Afsar‐Manesh N, Bierman AS, et al. Guiding principles to address the impact of algorithm bias on racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6(12):e2345050. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45050
7. Bentley AR, Callier S, Rotimi C. The emergence of genomic research in Africa and new frameworks for equity in biomedical research. Ethn Dis 2019;29(Suppl 1):179‐186. https:// doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.S1.179
8. Martin AR, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, Okada Y, Neale BM, Daly MJ. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet 2019;51(4):584‐591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588‐019‐0379‐x
9. Naidoo S, Bottomley D, Naidoo M, Donnelly D, Thaldar DW. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Proposals for policy development in South Africa. S Afr J Bioeth Law 2022;15(1):11‐16. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i1.797
10. Hussain SA, Bresnahan M, Zhuang J. The bias algorithm: How AI in healthcare exacerbates ethnic and racial disparities – a scoping review. Ethn Health 2025;30(2):197‐214. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2422848